Thursday, November 20, 2008

Why I am a Locavore: Part II

As you all remember from my first post in this series, the primary reason why I consider myself a locavore is nutrition. Local foods are simply bred more for their nutrients (and thus taste) than their industrialized counterparts. But there are also many other reasons why I have chosen this lifestyle. I'll try and limit this post to a single issue, with others to follow in the weeks to come.

What is my second biggest reason for choosing local food? Animal cruelty. It's a broad topic, so to narrow it down let's consider a single animal: The cow. The life of a typical industrial cow and that of a slow food cow are remarkably similar in their first six months of life: Both are born on wide-open prairies and raised on a nutritionally sound diet of their mothers' milk and, later, grass. At this point, though, they each take two very different paths. At six months, the industrial cow is shipped off to a feed lot, where for the next several months she is fed a diet of corn, grain and nondescript protein additives (from soy or, horrifyingly, ground up cattle/chickens). Ever wonder just why cattle so desperately need antibiotics today? This diet is the very reason. Since they never evolved to eat grain, it makes them extremely sick. They tend to develop a slimy layer of film across the liquid in their rumen (first stomach), which makes it hard to expel gas. Thus, they require a constant dose of antibiotics to stay "healthy" - if that word is even appropriate here. In extreme cases, the gas trapped in their rumens expands to such a degree that it is pushed up against their lungs and they literally suffocate.

A grass-finished cow, on the other hand, is eating exactly what she is supposed to eat where she is supposed to eat it. She lives longer, since it takes years for cattle to fully mature on grass. (Timeframe is one of the major reasons why cattle are fed corn - they are ready for slaughter several years ahead of their grass-fed brethren.) She is antibiotic and hormone free, since there is no need to protect against disease when cattle are naturally healthy. Furthermore, grass-fed cattle tend to contribute to large-scale poly-culture farms. The cattle come in and graze the grass; they leave behind cow patties, which fertilize the soil; the chickens come in afterwards and eat the larvae that grow in them, providing a natural curb on the insect population and a huge boost of protein to the chickens' diets; their eggshells are thus thicker and the yolks are a beautiful orange because of it. When the grass is ready again, the cattle come through once more and the cycle starts all over again. When they are finally ready to be eaten, their meat is significantly lower in bad fats since they spent years wandering around fields and eating healthy grass. It's also significantly higher in nutrients, like B vitamins.

Imagine that: What's good for the land is what's good for the animals, which is what's good for us. What more could we ask for?

2 comments:

jack said...

thanks for sharing this. i wish there were more people speaking openly about the importance of food and produce raised/farmed the right way.

Caitlin said...

Thanks, and I agree. I am hoping that I can convince my friends and family that good food is worth it, but it's been an up hill battle. Talking about food is almost like talking about religion - no one wants to hear about all the horrible aspects of industrial farming unless they've already been converted. So now I have a blog so that they don't have to listen to me talk about it. ;)